Federal Appeals Court Limits the Government’s Ability to Strip your Gun RightsOctober 28, 2016
Federal law bans gun possession by felons, who are defined as people convicted of any “crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” There is an exception for misdemeanor state crimes, that are “punishable by a term of imprisonment of two years or less.” The Third Circuit Court of Appeals in a recent decision has ruled that it is unconstitutional to permanently bar individuals from owning firearms that are convicted of relatively minor offenses. In the combined cases of Binderup and Suarez v. the U.S. Attorney General, the government failed to prove that the plaintiffs represent a heightened risk to society.
The case involved two Pennsylvania men who had been convicted of misdemeanors in the 1990s and were subsequently prohibited from owning firearms. Binderup was convicted of “corrupting a minor,” and was sentenced only to a $300 fine plus three years’ probation. Julio Suarez was convicted in 1990 for carrying a handgun without a license and sentenced only to a $500 fine plus a suspended sentence of 180 days in jail and a year of probation. Both men have led law-abiding lives since there previous convictions. Binderup and Suarez noted that they want to obtain guns to defend themselves and their families within their homes, but have not done so in fear of violating the law.
The court stated in its ruling the following: “Where the Second Amendment’s guarantees apply, as they do for Binderup and Suarez, ‘certain policy choices’ are ‘necessarily’ taken ‘off the table.’ Forever prohibiting them from possessing any firearm is one of those policy choices.” The Second Amendment Foundation, which filed the suit, stated “Today’s victory confirms that the government can’t simply disarm anyone it wishes. At an absolute minimum, people convicted of non-serious crimes, who pose no threat to anyone, retain their fundamental rights.” SAF founder Alan Gouttlieb added, “In an era where government officials want to disqualify as many people as possible from gun ownership, this ruling is monumental. This case will lead to the restoration of people’s civil and constitutional right to own a firearm that is long overdue.”
Leave a Comment
Disclaimer: The material on this blog has been prepared and is copyrighted by WipeRecord, a division of Eastman, Libersat & Meyler, PC ("WipeRecord"). The material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Information provided by or cited to third parties does not necessarily reflect the opinions of WipeRecord or any of its attorneys or clients. Results of any expungement or restoration of civil and/or firearm rights may vary from case to case. We obtained your email address when you took the eligibility test on our website. Please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisement. Please refer to our website for prices. This is a legal advertisement. If you have already hired or retained a lawyer in connection with your gun rights restoration, please disregard this letter. Our lawyers do not have professional liability insurance.